![]() |
|
Features in Upcoming Comfigurator 3.7 - Printable Version +- Comfort Automation/ Security System Forums (https://www.comfortforums.com) +-- Forum: Software Applications (https://www.comfortforums.com/forum-4.html) +--- Forum: Comfigurator (https://www.comfortforums.com/forum-20.html) +---- Forum: Comfigurator 3.x Old Versions (Archive) (https://www.comfortforums.com/forum-87.html) +---- Thread: Features in Upcoming Comfigurator 3.7 (/thread-3453.html) |
- juwi_uk - 09-28-2013 I notice there\'s a new \"Display Manual\" hyperlink too against the UCM\'s which is helpful. I presume the Known Bugs (1) is a one off you just need to do after upgrade to 3.7.5? Julian - juwi_uk - 09-28-2013 In Known bugs you say 4.If Last Security Mode has only \"security off\" Presume this sentence is incomplete? - slychiu - 09-28-2013 Yes you need to write to comfort the first time only for each system that you have Thanks for spotting the Manuals Link we forgot to mention that! - juwi_uk - 09-28-2013 Hi Just been playing with \"Action 43: Clear Event Log\"; it works exactly as expected. Question is though should this not be a privileged action as now it seems anyone could potentially use to cover their tracks? I would have thought a checkbox on the Sign-In Codes page for \"Reset Event Log\" or something? Also are these new actions going to be available via the Comfort Protocol as well? Julian - juwi_uk - 09-28-2013 It doesn\'t seem to do the display manuals for all the modules yet in my systems for sure at the moment: Controller: Yes UCM/Eth: No UCM/GSM: No UCM/ZWave: Yes UCM/Smartfit: No --> But wouldn\'t presume it too either! What determines whether the link is available or not? Julian - slychiu - 09-28-2013 UCM/GSM manual link should be seen, there is even a screenshot in the post introducing 3.7.5 UCM manuals should be seen but is missing in the version (still beta) I dont think there need not be any privileged restriction to action 43 to clear event log. These are programmed by the installer or the user and not accessed during operation. Putting a checkbox on sign in codes and unchecking it is the same as not using the action in the first place. You can always check the user number in the response Disarming the system is also possible by Response and this is a much higher security risk than clearing the event log. It is up to the one doing the programming to access the security risks for the end user. There is no need for additional commands in the protocol. You can always use the Do Action DA command to do any action eg DA2B - juwi_uk - 09-28-2013 Not for me then it seems! :0( - juwi_uk - 09-28-2013 Sorry duplicate post (can be removed) - juwi_uk - 09-28-2013 I\'m guessing it only does with the UCM/GSM4 at the moment then. - slychiu - 09-29-2013 The missing links will be fixed in the next version, hopefully the release |