![]() |
|
LightwaveRF interfacing, multiple commands - Printable Version +- Comfort Automation/ Security System Forums (https://www.comfortforums.com) +-- Forum: Third Party (interfacing to Comfort) (https://www.comfortforums.com/forum-5.html) +--- Forum: Universal UCM (https://www.comfortforums.com/forum-94.html) +--- Thread: LightwaveRF interfacing, multiple commands (/thread-3714.html) |
- Majik - 02-17-2014 The UCM/Universal to LightwaveRF can be found at http://www.comfortforums.com/forum94/3066.html I\'m interfacing with a LightwaveRF WIFIlink device. In general it works,but in cases where I have a response with multiple actions, each of which sends commands to the WfiLink, I can see the commands going out over the network with Wireshark but the WifiLink only seems to respond to the first command (with an \"OK\" response. It\'s as if the commands are coming too fast, or the WifiLink cannot recieve a new command until the first has been processed. Is there a way to make these work more reliably? May there\'s a way to wait until the OK response has been received before sending the next command? Cheers, Keith - ident - 02-19-2014 The UCM/Universal does not wait for the OK reply from Lightwave This is because the Universal UCM is not specifically tailored for the Lightwave wifilink - it sends programmed commands in the list You can work around by inserting a 1 second delay between commands using Do Response after x seconds This short interval should be enough time for the wifi link to respond - Majik - 02-20-2014 OK, thanks. It might be worth updating the application note to reflect this. Cheers, Keith - ident - 02-20-2014 Yes we should certainly do that - palmlodge - 02-25-2014 Keith, I\'ve been asking for a pause command for quite some time. Feel free to add your voice. - ident - 03-09-2014 This has been brought up in the last R&D meeting. There may be a way to implement an inline delay in firmware |