10-01-2014, 10:04 AM
Is that the log of the time when the cbus group 100 was switched on and then off by Zwave?
We need to see the logs at the time when this happened
We need to see the logs at the time when this happened
10-01-2014, 10:04 AM
10-01-2014, 10:14 AM
Yes, that was at the time that the GA was switched ON and OFF.
10-01-2014, 11:22 AM
We are trying to understand the log file that you sent
The node shown is 19 but in the cclx file, it was node 15 that was suposed to be linked to Cbus group 100
Did you change your Zwave network?
We see that something has to send 3 commands to node 19 with NO ROUTE. What does that mean. Total time for 3 commands is 4.5 seconds which seems very slow. Perhaps there is something wrong with the node and it is not replying correctly to the poll. There is no info about what it replied to the poll
For example if the 1st time it was polled it replied ON and the 2nd time it replied Off then the Cbus group would switch on and off
Hence it looks like a problem with the zwave network or device itself
The node shown is 19 but in the cclx file, it was node 15 that was suposed to be linked to Cbus group 100
Did you change your Zwave network?
We see that something has to send 3 commands to node 19 with NO ROUTE. What does that mean. Total time for 3 commands is 4.5 seconds which seems very slow. Perhaps there is something wrong with the node and it is not replying correctly to the poll. There is no info about what it replied to the poll
For example if the 1st time it was polled it replied ON and the 2nd time it replied Off then the Cbus group would switch on and off
Hence it looks like a problem with the zwave network or device itself
10-01-2014, 01:41 PM
slychiu wrote:
No I did not make any changes. But I can see on the Zwave side Node 19 is the Side Lamp, and it has activity on Cbus even though the device shows as Device 15 in Comfort. Seeing that this is a multichannel, where is the Node ID of the second Channel in Comfort?
slychiu wrote:
Quote:We are trying to understand the log file that you sent
The node shown is 19 but in the cclx file, it was node 15 that was suposed to be linked to Cbus group 100
Did you change your Zwave network?
No I did not make any changes. But I can see on the Zwave side Node 19 is the Side Lamp, and it has activity on Cbus even though the device shows as Device 15 in Comfort. Seeing that this is a multichannel, where is the Node ID of the second Channel in Comfort?
slychiu wrote:
Quote:We see that something has to send 3 commands to node 19 with NO ROUTE. What does that mean. Total time for 3 commands is 4.5 seconds which seems very slow. Perhaps there is something wrong with the node and it is not replying correctly to the poll. There is no info about what it replied to the pollI will reset the UCM and learn/join the network again, and see if that gets the Node ID sorted.
For example if the 1st time it was polled it replied ON and the 2nd time it replied Off then the Cbus group would switch on and off
Hence it looks like a problem with the zwave network or device itself
10-01-2014, 03:45 PM
The Node ID is shared by all the channels of the same node
10-01-2014, 03:51 PM
[user=1]slychiu[/user] wrote:
Quote:The Node ID is shared by all the channels of the same nodeOn Zwave side, it shows two Devices with two Node IDs.
10-01-2014, 04:13 PM
Can you show what you mean? Zwave is supposed to be standardised, it cannot appear as 2 nodes on 1 device and 1 node on another
10-01-2014, 04:26 PM
slychiu wrote:
Device #44
ID 19
Second Device
Device #47
ID e2
Quote:Can you show what you mean? Zwave is supposed to be standardised, it cannot appear as 2 nodes on 1 device and 1 node on anotherFirst Device
Device #44
ID 19
Second Device
Device #47
ID e2
10-02-2014, 10:52 AM
Zwave multi channel devices on the same device share the same Node ID, that is the basic principle of Zwave multichanel devices
When you say on the Zwave side you may be referring to a specific manufacture terminology which may not be the standrad Zwave terminology that we can understand
ID 19 and ID E2 seem to be in hex notation not Decimal
and this is different from what is learned in the UCM/Zwave
You will have to find out more from the device manufacture on what is the meaning of their \"IDs\" and \"Devices\"
When you say on the Zwave side you may be referring to a specific manufacture terminology which may not be the standrad Zwave terminology that we can understand
ID 19 and ID E2 seem to be in hex notation not Decimal
and this is different from what is learned in the UCM/Zwave
You will have to find out more from the device manufacture on what is the meaning of their \"IDs\" and \"Devices\"