02-27-2009, 06:15 PM
Hi Clinton
That looks like you are busy then. As I said before it was your code that got me interested in playing with a client in the first place so many thanks.
I\'d like to find a safe way to work over the Internet that doesnt require a PC left running back at the home. If I have to leave a server on then I might as well just run my existing client on that and remote desktop (RDP) to that instead. I guess the CWM is the true solution here as an appliance but I cant justify ã600 for it as a dedicated thing and so I\'m looking at leaving a server switched on and remoting to it or perhaps looking at changing to a client-server model like you.
I wish Cytech could come up with a more secure login method ie rotating user codes; something like using a secureID fob where I could logon remotely using a onetime code. Then I\'d feel using over the internet (mobile or PC based) would be more secure because even if someone could use a Sniffer (packet analyser) to look at the other commands (big deal) they\'d see the logon too but by the time they would have realised what it was it would have changed for anyone other than the currently connected socket.
Julian
That looks like you are busy then. As I said before it was your code that got me interested in playing with a client in the first place so many thanks.
I\'d like to find a safe way to work over the Internet that doesnt require a PC left running back at the home. If I have to leave a server on then I might as well just run my existing client on that and remote desktop (RDP) to that instead. I guess the CWM is the true solution here as an appliance but I cant justify ã600 for it as a dedicated thing and so I\'m looking at leaving a server switched on and remoting to it or perhaps looking at changing to a client-server model like you.
I wish Cytech could come up with a more secure login method ie rotating user codes; something like using a secureID fob where I could logon remotely using a onetime code. Then I\'d feel using over the internet (mobile or PC based) would be more secure because even if someone could use a Sniffer (packet analyser) to look at the other commands (big deal) they\'d see the logon too but by the time they would have realised what it was it would have changed for anyone other than the currently connected socket.
Julian